Much of society’s secret agenda has yet to be unraveled. Every individual is playing their own game of politics. How does one unearth all of them and bring it to the fore? Then again, the question seems to be: why does it matter? Well, obviously if it affects one’s social well-being, then there seems to be a socially justified reason to interject this flow of political continuity. Doesn’t it?
Consequently, the terms "social well-being" then appears to need a definition. There seems no particular arrangement of words which can succinctly define these terms given its conceptual character. Put in another way, it conversely means one’s own political agenda itself. Thus, everything would be political in the field of politics for there to be an actual social justification that is externally justified in itself. It is only a blame game which inevitably culminates to a deadlock of political morality.
So how do we escape the gravity of this field? To explain ourselves outside this framework of political bickering? Or political involvement? Is that even a possibility? As the functionalists have it, we are all interdependent to preserve the survival of society by means of a social consensus. After all, no one can or should live in vacuum, exiled from the status quo, even if it is somehow politically driven.
At the end of the day, politics is merely a means to an end. Why do we have to institutionalize it?
Is there no other way out? “Out of what?”, one would ask.
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment